{"id":5992,"date":"2023-06-01T21:04:49","date_gmt":"2023-06-01T19:04:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/2023\/06\/01\/la-jouissance-sans-le-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/"},"modified":"2023-06-01T23:26:29","modified_gmt":"2023-06-01T21:26:29","slug":"jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/","title":{"rendered":"Jouissance without S1<\/sub> \u2013 Dossia Avdelidi<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 1970, Lacan argues that he always wanted someone to make a hole in the paternal metaphor. He himself had made this attempt a few years earlier by pluralizing the Name-of-the-Father, but he was \u201cgagged\u201d[1]<\/a>, as he said. Despite this fact, the Oedipus becomes a residual myth for Lacan, a myth that will not hold up, Freud\u2019s dream, something lame. From \u201cFamily complexes in the formation of the individual\u201d[2]<\/a> until the end of his teaching, we see this dimension of the Oedipus.<\/p>\n

In the Seminar R.S.I.,<\/em> Lacan tried to do without the Name-of-the-Father. He argues that to do without the Oedipus complex, the real must overcome the symbolic in two points. He specifies: \u201cit is not a question of a change of order, a change of plan, between the real and the symbolic \u2013\u00a0it is simply that they knot differently. Because, to knot differently, is what makes the essential of the Oedipus Complex and this is what analysis operates on.\u201d[3]<\/a> However, not only does he not specify what this different knotting consists of, but at the end of the seminar, he unknots the symbolic and the real to knot them with the Name-of-the-Father.<\/p>\n

In this seminar, we witness various elaborations concerning the question of the father. The universal paternal is put in question. \u201cNormality is not the paternal virtue par excellence\u201d[4]<\/a>, he affirms. Thus, he will evoke the paternal p\u00e8re<\/em>-version. <\/em>This p\u00e8re<\/em>-version is the only guarantee of the father function for him, which is none other than the function of the symptom. P\u00e8re<\/em>-version and symptom are two major characteristics that he attributes to the function of the father. Lacan hears the function of the symptom as a mathematical formulation: F(x). In the place of x, various elements can be placed. The x \u201cis that which from the unconscious can be translated by a letter\u201d[5]<\/a>, he specifies.<\/p>\n

The symptom is something in which we believe. We seek analysis precisely because we believe that the symptom means something, that it is to be deciphered. Likewise, the father is a question of faith and implies belief. In the Seminar From an other to the Other<\/em>, Lacan affirms:\u00a0\u201cThe essence and function of the father as Name, as pivot of discourse, precisely holds in this, that after all, we can never know who the father is. Always go looking, it is a question of faith.\u201d[6]<\/a><\/p>\n

In The Sinthome<\/em>, he invites us to use it without believing in it[7]<\/a>. The Name-of-the-father acquires a functional status of knotting. The challenge is now to use the Name-of-the-Father pragmatically, without believing in it theoretically.<\/p>\n

To do without it on condition that one uses it, constitutes a devaluation of the Name-of-the-Father. This devaluation is, according to Jacques-Alain Miller, a devaluation of the Name-of-the-Father \u201cto the rank of a pragmatic instrument\u201d[8]<\/a>, which constitutes the key of the clinic. We can do without believing in the Name-of-the-Father but continue to use it, to resolve the opaque jouissance of the symptom. To resolve it, J.-A.\u00a0Miller says that it is necessary to become the dupe of the father[9]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Name-of-the-Father is an S1<\/sub> that allows jouissance to be made legible. But the steps that J.-A.\u00a0Miller invites us to take, is to think jouissance without S1<\/sub>. It is an illegible, unnameable jouissance. This is in fact the essence of jouissance.<\/p>\n

References from the author:
\n[1]<\/a> Lacan J., The Seminar<\/em>, Book\u00a0XVII, The Other Side of Psychoanalysis,<\/em> edited by J.-A. Miller, translated by R. Grigg, New York\/London, W.W. Norton, 2007, p.\u00a0109.
\n[2]<\/a> Lacan J., \u00ab\u00a0Les Complexes familiaux dans la formation de l\u2019individu\u00a0\u00bb, Autres \u00e9crits<\/em>, Paris, Seuil, 2001, p.\u00a023-84. [Our translation]
\n[3]<\/a> Lacan J., Le S\u00e9minaire, livre\u00a0XXII, \u00ab\u00a0R.S.I.\u00a0\u00bb,<\/em> le\u00e7on du 14\u00a0janvier\u00a01975, Ornicar\u00a0?<\/em>, n\u00b03, 1975, p.\u00a0103. [Our translation]
\n[4]<\/a> Ibid.<\/em>, le\u00e7on du 21\u00a0janvier\u00a01975, p.\u00a0108. [Our translation]
\n[5]<\/a> Ibid<\/em>., p.\u00a0107. [Our translation]
\n[6]<\/a> Lacan J., Le S\u00e9minaire<\/em>, livre\u00a0XVI, D\u2019un Autre \u00e0 l\u2019autre<\/em>, texte \u00e9tabli par J.-A.\u00a0Miller, Paris, Seuil, 2006, p.\u00a0152. [Our translation]
\n[7]<\/a> Cf. Lacan J., The Seminar<\/em>, Book\u00a0XXIII, The Sinthome<\/em>, edited by J.-A.\u00a0Miller, translated by A. Price, Cambridge\/Malden, Polity Press, 2016, p.\u00a0116.
\n[8]<\/a> Miller J.-A., \u00ab\u00a0L\u2019orientation lacanienne. Tout le monde est fou\u00a0\u00bb, enseignement prononc\u00e9 dans le cadre du d\u00e9partement de psychanalyse de l\u2019universit\u00e9 Paris\u00a08, le\u00e7on du 14\u00a0mai\u00a02008, in\u00e9dit. [Our translation]
\n[9]<\/a> Ibid. <\/em>[Our translation]<\/p>\n

Translation: Tracy Hoijer-Favre
\nProofreading: Caroline Heanue<\/p>\n

Picture : \u00a9 Pascale Simonet<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In 1970, Lacan argues that he always wanted someone to make a hole in the paternal metaphor. He himself had made this attempt a few years earlier by pluralizing the Name-of-the-Father, but he was \u201cgagged\u201d[1], as he said. Despite this fact, the Oedipus becomes a residual myth for Lacan, a myth that will not hold […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":5949,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[170],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Avdelidi.Simonet.jpg","yoast_head":"\nJouissance without S1 \u2013 Dossia Avdelidi - Pipol11<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jouissance without S1 \u2013 Dossia Avdelidi - Pipol11\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In 1970, Lacan argues that he always wanted someone to make a hole in the paternal metaphor. He himself had made this attempt a few years earlier by pluralizing the Name-of-the-Father, but he was \u201cgagged\u201d[1], as he said. Despite this fact, the Oedipus becomes a residual myth for Lacan, a myth that will not hold […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pipol11\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-01T19:04:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-01T21:26:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Avdelidi.Simonet.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"750\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"375\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\">\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\">\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/\",\"name\":\"Pipol11\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Avdelidi.Simonet.jpg\",\"width\":750,\"height\":375,\"caption\":\"\\u00a9 Pascale Simonet\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/\",\"name\":\"Jouissance without S1 \\u2013 Dossia Avdelidi - Pipol11\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-01T19:04:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-01T21:26:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/#\/schema\/person\/f8cb217f45103fcb436f14acee2b5b9b\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/2023\/06\/01\/jouissance-without-s1-dossia-avdelidi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/#\/schema\/person\/f8cb217f45103fcb436f14acee2b5b9b\",\"name\":\"PIPOL TEAM\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b98e815813af2d80d5c2073a926d2dd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"PIPOL TEAM\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","amp_validity":null,"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5992"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5992\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5949"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pipol11.pipolcongres.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}